As the driving force behind what is now the Highlight consumer and client experience, Ethan Kellough, Highlight’s CPTO and Founder has been at the forefront of the technological development. With years of product design and development experience under his belt - particularly leveraging consumer empathy - Ethan knew there was a better way to conduct research, build better products, and bring all of these processes into the modern era.
We had the opportunity to dive deeper into Highlight’s technology advancements with Ethan himself and we think he explains it all best - read on to find out the "backend" to this dynamic development story.
The driving force was realizing that there was not a great way to get products in the hands of consumers when you're doing product testing. The quantitative research space has become a lot more sophisticated as digital data collection and analysis has become more prolific, but when there's a physical product involved, it's really challenging to get good insights.
My background is originally in mechanical engineering and product design. As a product designer, one of the challenges that I always came up against was getting feedback on designs. You can either go one direction, which is really deep user research - get five or six people to use the prototype and try it and get insights - or the other way is going sort of shallow and broad with 300 people: you show them a photo and say, ‘well, what do you think about this’. But there's not really a good middle ground for getting quality, actionable feedback about physical products.
Diving more into how we are doing this on the platform itself - we've definitely tried to streamline the process for both parties and that's part of why we collect information upfront. For consumers, they don't have to constantly go back and fill out screeners and answer the same questions over and over again. And at the same time, they don't get offered products that we don't think will work for them. For brands, we simplify the process by using our technology - something that hasn't been done with physical product testing to date. We've optimized for speed and efficiency and making sure that we're a high quality offering that tries to keep errors to a minimum.
The technology we built is really ready for scalability: it’s a pretty modern tech stack with a strong focus on fault tolerance and scalability. We're using a lot of the same types of technologies that a lot of firms in Silicon Valley are using, which isn't the typical approach in the market research industry. Overall, we've taken a traditional old legacy process and said, okay, how do we put a 2021 spin on this? How do we bring this into the modern era?
The other aspect that was a non-negotiable was inclusivity. There are some common practices in market research that we questioned along the way, asking ourselves, does this have to be done this way? How do we make this more inclusive? We're building a community and a consumer brand around giving feedback and we should be inclusive to people who want to give good feedback regardless of any other criteria. We really built the core of the application and the incentive model, and everything around quality feedback. We tried to make it as inclusive as possible for as many people to be a member.
What we've focused on is simplicity. Our design principles and our manifesto are around taking a very complex process and trying to make it simple. For all the stakeholders involved, simple and beautiful are the main principles. Product testing is complex and has a lot of variables but we really focused on how we can make a user experience for both the Highlighters and brands that are as simple and seamless as possible. We want them to get the best possible insights and give the best possible feedback so we focused a lot on that aspect of the user experience on both sides.
The reactions have been really positive. There's nothing like this technology in the physical product testing world. The traditional market research processes for physical product testing are really manual, they're really slow, and involve lots of emailing back and forth. Every company that we've talked to has said that this platform is a game changer in their process to make things more efficient. So, all in all, I think the reception has been really positive. We're really looking forward to getting more brands on the platform, getting more products tested, and continuing to sort of tackle this big problem of 90% of products failing. We took extra time upfront to make sure that we had something that was going to work for not just 10 brands or 100 brands, but 1000's or millions of products tested.